The Rosie Lies Of 26th April 2007, 02:08 Pm Allowed On Cf, not all forums are created equal Options

[mozart]

I copied and am pasting this here right away because I know that the biased mods over on CF will probably delete it as soon as they see it.

TRUTHMAGNET opened this thread today after rosie55's attempt to slander linda by opening a thread with the false title "3ABN Lawyer's Discussion. CF did not attempt to delete rosie55's thread even though it was falsly titled and created to slander and start gossip. rosie55 deleted her own thread when it did not go the way she had planned.

Originally Posted by Rosie55
#1
3ABN Lawyers Discussion
(Lie #1- false thread title; this was never meant to reveal "Lawyers Discussion")

Tomatoe:
I am still not understanding why Linda seems to want to take Danny to court.
( Lie #2 - not asking for "Lawyers Discussion" )

Could you tell me what she got at the time of the divorce and again why she would go to court again?
( Lie #3 - AGAIN? twisting the truth & not revealing "Lawyers Discussion" )

Does Danny have assets that he didn't disclose before the divorce?
( Lie #4 - Asking for Deliberate Retorical Spin on Question- not asking for "Lawyers Discussion")

I am assuming she wants more money.
( Lie #5 - not asking for "Lawyers Discussion" but assuming to slander and start gossip )

I'm curious, does Linda hold down a job?
( Lie #6 - not asking for "Lawyers Discussion" and degrading Linda by inferring, by the usage of the term "hold down a job", that she is somehow irresponsible and has trouble "holding down a job" thus trying to start slanderous and degrading gossip )

What does she do to earn her living?
( Lie #7 - not asking for "Lawyers Discussion" - question is irrelevant and trying to start demeaning gossip )

Thanks for making this more clear.
( Lie #8 - not asking for "Lawyers Discussion" but accepting in advance of reply from tomatoe, not a lawyer, that his answers will make things more clear - subject reeking of pre-planned answers )

Oh, and this question is for Tomatoe ONLY. Thanks for respecting this.
( Lie #9 - not asking for "Lawyers Discussion" but trying to start demeaning gossip aimed at Linda )

If the motive of opening this public thread were seeking truth, then one has to wonder why the proposed query is for only one designated responder who is preliminarily set up as being the only one knowing the true answers that can clarify the original poster's confusion. Would that defy the definition of "FORUM"?

End Quote from Rosie55


*********************************************************************
Now we have tomatoe who made at least a dozen or two posts spinning his idealistic loyal views as facts. Best i recall, in the entire thread, there was not one "Lawyer Discussion" or documentation of any Lawyer Discussions.

Originally Posted by tomatoe - ( his last statement before thread was closed at Rosie55's request.)
Franny,
".....YOU are offended because Rosie opened a thread to refute false allegations? "
End Quote from tomatoe

Where is that part of Rosie's thread? Does she use invisible ink? Maybe the type is too small. I'm not finding it. Can you show me that again?

{Now Tomatoe; here's your script.
linda is taking danny to court just to get more money. she doesn't want to work, has spent the 3/4 million they gave her and now want's even more. she doesn't "hold down a job" because she had rather get more money out of danny than work. she doesn't want to earn her own living anymore. she wants danny to pay her way in the style she is accustomed. got that? love, mollie }

********************************************************************
Slandering Linda was the ONLY point of the ROSIE55's thread. It had nothing to do with nor did it contain one sentence of "3ABN Lawyer's Discussion. Since they didn't get what they wanted out of it, they closed it down.

This post has been edited by mozart: Apr 29 2007, 06:17 PM

[watchbird]

I'm finding it hard to understand why we want to bring stuff over here that isn't even fit for the forum it came from. We know what kind of stuff these folk say... we don't need to see it over and over again.

[Rosyroi]

When I read it it looked to me as if one person was asking a question in one name and answered his/her own question in another name.

Just my own humble opinion.

Rosyroi

[Noahswife]

When I read it it looked to me as if one person was asking a question in one name and answered his/her own question in another name.

Just my own humble opinion.

Rosyroi

Hey Rosyroi

I had planned to respond to Mozart earlier but your comment points out something that can be documented. Many of us spell things wrong or make typographical errors. In fact this was pointed out several times in other threads.

What is interesting is that Rosie55 has made the same spelling error with a particular word that Joe Smith and Eyewitness made (for newbies these are banned posters). This same spelling error was made by another DS apologist that still posts here at BSDA. Now what kind of stretch would it be to assume that either the same person is writing all the material for posting or that IDs are shared? And Rosyroi, with all the hundreds and hundreds of posts here in the 3abn forum not a single other person has made the same spelling error.

Talk about things that make one go, hmmmmmmm.

nw
C"i"



This post has been edited by Noahswife: Apr 29 2007, 09:40 PM

[lookin4truth]

Hey Rosyroi

I had planned to respond to Mozart earlier but your comment points out something that can be documented. Many of us spell things wrong or make typographical errors. In fact this was pointed out several times in other threads.

What is interesting is that Rosie55 has made the same spelling error with a particular word that Joe Smith and Eyewitness made (for newbies these are banned posters). This same spelling error was made by another DS apologist that still posts here at BSDA. Now what kind of stretch would it be to assume that either the same person is writing all the material for posting or that IDs are shared? And Rosyroi, with all the hundreds and hundreds of posts here in the 3abn forum not a single other person has made the same spelling error.

Talk about things that make one go, hmmmmmmm.

nw
C"i"



Hey Rosyroi

I had planned to respond to Mozart earlier but your comment points out something that can be documented. Many of us spell things wrong or make typographical errors. In fact this was pointed out several times in other threads.

What is interesting is that Rosie55 has made the same spelling error with a particular word that Joe Smith and Eyewitness made (for newbies these are banned posters). This same spelling error was made by another DS apologist that still posts here at BSDA. Now what kind of stretch would it be to assume that either the same person is writing all the material for posting or that IDs are shared? And Rosyroi, with all the hundreds and hundreds of posts here in the 3abn forum not a single other person has made the same spelling error.

Talk about things that make one go, hmmmmmmm.

nw
C"i"

It's deja vu all over again

Sorry, couldn't resist

[Noahswife]

It's deja vu all over again

Sorry, couldn't resist

Oh well making up for lost time not being here much the past 10 days.

Sorry



This post has been edited by Noahswife: Apr 29 2007, 09:43 PM

[Rosyroi]

It's deja vu all over again

Sorry, couldn't resist

Rosyroi

Rosyroi

[SoulEspresso]

I'm finding it hard to understand why we want to bring stuff over here that isn't even fit for the forum it came from. We know what kind of stuff these folk say... we don't need to see it over and over again.

I tend to agree, WB ... but I don't disagree with mo for posting either. I might not have done it, but it is another brick in the wall, so to speak, of the kind of people that stand up on Danny's side. I wouldn't be surprised if Rosie55 reads, or used to read, on BSDA. If so, that person knows we're paying attention ...

This post has been edited by SoulEspresso: Apr 29 2007, 11:53 PM

[mozart]

ROSY, are you referring to this thread or the ones posted at CF? BTW the mod deleted the entire truthmagnet thread less than a half hour after it was posted so i'm glad i brought it here to at least be seen. even tho' we are aware of the childish and devious shenanagans they play, i thought they were so clear and concise within this one little thread that it was worth seeing.

When I read it it looked to me as if one person was asking a question in one name and answered his/her own question in another name.

Just my own humble opinion.

Rosyroi

This post has been edited by mozart: Apr 30 2007, 12:52 AM

[mozart]

I'm finding it hard to understand why we want to bring stuff over here that isn't even fit for the forum it came from. We know what kind of stuff these folk say... we don't need to see it over and over again.

it may only prove a point that most of us already know, but i thought it painted a simple, open picture, that shows in one glimpse who these posters are. sorry you found this unfit and useless WB.

This post has been edited by mozart: Apr 30 2007, 12:51 AM

[Johann]

it may only prove a point that most of us already know, but i thought it painted a simple, open picture, that shows in one glimpse who these posters are. sorry you found this unfit and useless WB.

Mozart, your post got me to the Christian Forums where I had not looked for a long time - to discover the thread is closad for now.

[mozart]

yes Rosie55 closed her thread falsly & seductively titled "3ABN Lawyers Discussion" when it totally backfired on her. it is locked, but you can still read it.
Truthmagnet opened another thread this morning exposing Rosie55 and Tomatoe for the deceivers that they are and TMs new thread, that is pasted at the beginning here, got immediately and completely deleted by the CF mods who said it was flaming. i expected as much that is why i posted it here. Truthmagnet exposes each bogus question by Rosie55 who's agenda was to slander and start rumors and negative gossip about Linda and trying to make it look like innocent questions and "confusion" for her that only tomatoe could clear up. they obviously had a script they were foolish enough to think they could get away with but it blew up in there face, however even with their flaming insults in the approx. 100posts in that thread, the CF mods never once intervened.. it had nothing to do with 3ABN lawyers discussions so TM opened a rebuttel thread and the CF mod deleted it almost immediately.

Mozart, your post got me to the Christian Forums where I had not looked for a long time - to discover the thread is closad for now.

This post has been edited by mozart: Apr 30 2007, 02:08 AM

[awesumtenor]

yes Rosie55 closed her thread falsly & seductively titled "3ABN Lawyers Discussion" when it totally backfired on her. it is locked, but you can still read it.
Truthmagnet opened another thread this morning exposing Rosie55 and Tomatoe for the deceivers that they are and TMs new thread, that is pasted at the beginning here, got immediately and completely deleted by the CF mods who said it was flaming. i expected as much that is why i posted it here. Truthmagnet exposes each bogus question by Rosie55 who's agenda was to slander and start rumors and negative gossip about Linda and trying to make it look like innocent questions and "confusion" for her that only tomatoe could clear up. they obviously had a script they were foolish enough to think they could get away with but it blew up in there face, however even with their flaming insults in the approx. 100posts in that thread, the CF mods never once intervened.. it had nothing to do with 3ABN lawyers discussions so TM opened a rebuttel thread and the CF mod deleted it almost immediately.

The mods at CF, like the mods at CA are pro-Danny's camp... and have reached a point where they barely maintain a pretense of objectivity. If one is going to post there, they should know that those critical of DS et al are kept on a much shorter leash and given far less leeway than those who are DS supporters.

In His service,
Mr. J

[watchbird]

it may only prove a point that most of us already know, but i thought it painted a simple, open picture, that shows in one glimpse who these posters are. sorry you found this unfit and useless WB.

What I said was that I found it hard to understand.... .... but I'm getting there....

I also found it hard to understand why anyone... even a Danny or Dannyclone... would use "tomatoe" as a "public name"..... ......




...... then it hit me..... ..... ...... ..... ..... ..... .....




.......... .........

[Observer]

Mozart, your post got me to the Christian Forums where I had not looked for a long time - to discover the thread is closad for now.

Same here, Johann. I went there for probably the 3rd or 4th (I do not remember exactly.) time.

I do not expect to go back soon.

Same song. Same verse. A broken record.