Rumors, Lies, & False Accusations Travel With Joy, Confronting AT and Gailon with Truth Options

[Shiny Penny]

I don't really care when or if you edit your post, it's all the same to me, but I do think it's important to point out the patterns of your character to other readers, who may otherwise miss it, so they can add that to the mix as they form a correct picture of who and what we have to deal with here.

Before I came to BSDA, I probably posted over seven thousand pages of opinions, on five or six major message boards, with members of the highest quality--experts (doctors, lawyers, ministers, professors, philosophers, editors, and authors) on various subjects ranging from bio-ethics and physics to onotology. Of the thousands of people that posted on those forums, all were very careful and everyone considered it dishonorable to edit posts after the fact. It was considered unethical by all. But, you may be a special case with personal challenges...so, I'll consider that.

Thanks.

I find it rather incongruous that you will suddenly appoint yourself judge of the ethics of editing on this forum. And your language kind of sounds like we are hardly members of quality, much less of "highest quality." If the other forums consider it to be unethical to edit - great.

If there are rules on editing posts on this forum, I am not aware of them. Feel free post the link, if there is one. If there is something unethical on editing, then tell Calvin to remove the "edit" button. It seems to me the button is there to be used when needed or warranted.

But tomorrow I think I'll edit this post just for the heck of it.

[inga]

Your description of Linda proves that you absolutely do not know her at all. Since you don't, how and why would you describe your opinion of her personality? I have known Linda for years. None of the words that you use in your description are anywhere close to her true character. If you were to use words like, fantasizer, (if she doesn't like the way things are going she fantasizes in her mind they are going the way she wants them to), self absorbed, conniving, an ultimate actress, arrogant......Those are just a few of what comes to mind......

Nice to see someone demonstrating such Christian love.

You seem to have some very strong feelings towards Linda ... makes a person think you might have had a very close (as in family?) relationship with Linda some time in the past.

[inga]

This subject is just one of several that has been dumped in Danny's lap as if Linda never existed.

Danny AppleTree is complaining that Danny is treated "as if Linda never existed."
Am I the only one that sees this as exceedingly funny?

This post has been edited by inga: Feb 27 2008, 02:37 PM

[princessdi]

Well, maybe not funny, by one lying in the bed they made for themselves. Danny is the one who had all the programs come and retape anyt programs with lInda in them, he is the one who while making thinly veiled comments aobut Linda, also acted as if she never existed. So much so that I know people who have started watching 3ABN since Linda's departure,a nd they truly thought that Danny had not remarried since his frist wife died. Danny is the one who insisted on Lind signing that gag order, when he thought it would benefit him to be the only one talking. Does he really think that Linda is stupid enough to start talking now? He wanted to be the only one talking, he set things up so it looked as if she never existed at 3ABN or in his life.....he got his wish. This is further evidence that his actions were not honorable. he allowed satan to lure him out on a limb and now the enmy is sawing it off behind him.

His people need to stop complaining about the bed Danny made for himself.

Danny AppleTree is complaining that Danny is treated "as if Linda never existed."
Am I the only one that sees this as exceedingly funny?

[calvin]

I find it rather incongruous that you will suddenly appoint yourself judge of the ethics of editing on this forum. And your language kind of sounds like we are hardly members of quality, much less of "highest quality." If the other forums consider it to be unethical to edit - great.

If there are rules on editing posts on this forum, I am not aware of them. Feel free post the link, if there is one. If there is something unethical on editing, then tell Calvin to remove the "edit" button. It seems to me the button is there to be used when needed or warranted.

But tomorrow I think I'll edit this post just for the heck of it.

The "edit" button is there to make corrections like spelling, grammar, and formatting. I don't really have a problem with you changing or adding to the content of your post as long as it is done minutes have the post, before many have read it and quoted you. However if you are making material changes hours or days after the post then you are being dishonest and that is unethical. Members who habitually abuse the "edit" privilege (it is a privilege that I have turned on for your convenience) will be dealt with.

[Pickle]

From what I have read (and they are the documents that you and Joy have put online) - I don't think that your interpretation is correct. Linda and Danny were buying what remained after their life interest in the home.- the remainder interest. The right to live in the house for their lifetimes was theirs and it had a value. The remainder interest is what belonged to 3ABN. And that's what Linda and Danny bought.

When did they buy the portion that wasn't the remainder interest?

[Pickle]

When did they buy the portion that wasn't the remainder interest?

I think this is an important question. If they never bought the portion that wasn't the remainder interest, then it was a gift to them and needed to be appropriately reported at the time the gift was made. Correct?

[Snoopy]

I think this is an important question. If they never bought the portion that wasn't the remainder interest, then it was a gift to them and needed to be appropriately reported at the time the gift was made. Correct?

Great questions, Mr. Pickle!! Could the answers lie in the defeaning silence??

[phoenix]

Great questions, Mr. Pickle!! Could the answers lie in the defeaning silence??

I suppose another possibility is that this overworked topic has become so tired, trite, deceptive, and mind numbingly boring that few can bear to read about it again.

[LaurenceD]

I suppose another possibility is that this overworked topic has become so tired, trite, deceptive, and mind numbingly boring that few can bear to read about it again.

But...you just got here, remember?

[LaurenceD]

However if you are making material changes hours or days after the post then you are being dishonest and that is unethical.

For a long time, I use to try and wait till these folks got done with their editing so I could respond without being part of the confusion and changes. Lost cause...at least that's I came to believe. You'll find one post in this thread that was edited some 19 hours "after the fact."

One moderator of another forum put it like this:

I believe that discussions here at ______ are like discussions in real life - you don't change what you already said, you only can attempt to clarify your position by saying more. IOW, you can't delete a comment that you've posted, you only can post a reply to yourself and attempt to clarify what you've said.

You should think twice before you click the submit button, because once you click it, we aren't going to let you Undo it.

Many forums allow editing for 5 minutes after a post to correct spelling, grammar, and formatting. That seems reasonable.

[Shiny Penny]

The "edit" button is there to make corrections like spelling, grammar, and formatting. I don't really have a problem with you changing or adding to the content of your post as long as it is done minutes have the post, before many have read it and quoted you. However if you are making material changes hours or days after the post then you are being dishonest and that is unethical. Members who habitually abuse the "edit" privilege (it is a privilege that I have turned on for your convenience) will be dealt with.

Fair enough.

(But I will note that while the post was longer, it was not a material change in term of the thought of the post. I've explained that earlier, so I won't repeat my explanation there).

[Shiny Penny]

When did they buy the portion that wasn't the remainder interest?

Hold on a sec.

The important fact is: You are the one making the accusations that the transaction was illegal and/or improper. You have a responsibility to know ALL the facts before you accuse or pronounce guilty.

So go do your homework, fully and completely, before you slush around innuendoes and make a statement of some wrongdoing, when you really don't even know if any occurred. Ask Linda to help you out with these details, since she was an integral part of this transaction and it has been determined and reported on this forum and in this particular thread, that she was part of the discussions in the board meeting(s). And if she claims ignorance, do not fall for it!

Pickle, I'm getting tired of your shenanigans and those of your playmate, Joy. You may be pulling the wool over some eyes, you may have been most successful in pulling the wool over your own eyes, but I see right through you, and what I'm seeing is not good.

[Pickle]

Hold on a sec.

The important fact is: You are the one making the accusations that the facts we have stated are incorrect. You have a responsibility to know ALL the facts before you accuse or pronounce guilty.

Bottom line is that Danny never paid 3ABN for the fair market value of the house, and no one disputes that, not even you.

[appletree]

Hold on a sec.

The important fact is: You are the one making the accusations that the transaction was illegal and/or improper. You have a responsibility to know ALL the facts before you accuse or pronounce guilty.

So go do your homework, fully and completely, before you slush around innuendoes and make a statement of some wrongdoing, when you really don't even know if any occurred. Ask Linda to help you out with these details, since she was an integral part of this transaction and it has been determined and reported on this forum and in this particular thread, that she was part of the discussions in the board meeting(s). And if she claims ignorance, do not fall for it!

Pickle, I'm getting tired of your shenanigans and those of your playmate, Joy. You may be pulling the wool over some eyes, you may have been most successful in pulling the wool over your own eyes, but I see right through you, and what I'm seeing is not good.

SP
Maybe it is because Pickle is having to represent himself in court but anyway, he seems to think he knows more than a board full of successfull businessmen and several different attorney's. Did I leave out an auditing firm? The transaction went through professional scrutiny and that is good enough for me. For a "layman" to have the audacity to challenge their knowledge against his (pickle's) is totally off the wall.