Chapter 11, Naive.... Options

[PaperTigers]

Whatchamean "let's hope"... it already has.... except possibly for #9... which is three years away in the future.

..... Stay tuned..... ....... the story is not finished yet.....

that's the part i was talking about ... SAD SAD SAD

[inga]

Hope they are not advocates of the new Adventist divorce guide:-

Using my imagination

Hey, Denny, I think you've got it almost right below. But shouldn't the advice be to "Find younger spouse" (6) first? After all, it could be rather risky otherwise. One might not find a sexual partner for a while ... And I believe that #6 came first in the scenario we've been watching.... Of course, I could be wrong. It's happened once or twice before.

1. Go on national tv and claim to be working on marriage problems
2. Leave spouse
3a. Expand lust rule to spiritual adultery (whatever that is)
3b. Divorce spouse
4. Gag spouse
5. Whilst gag is in effect defame character of former spouse on tv and to whoever will listen
6. Find younger spouse
7. Marry younger spouse
8. Defame confidents of former spouse
9. Attempt to get point 3 on the next General conference session of 2010 (who knows other 'suffering' colleagues in the church may benefit from this new rule)
10. Attend weddings for former collegues who also experienced point 3

[Johann]

Hey, Denny, I think you've got it almost right below. But shouldn't the advice be to "Find younger spouse" (6) first? After all, it could be rather risky otherwise. One might not find a sexual partner for a while ... And I believe that #6 came first in the scenario we've been watching.... Of course, I could be wrong. It's happened once or twice before.

Some wonder how much credibility a so called "eye witness" can have. One eye witness claims to have heard Danny stating that his Brandy had been chasing him for . . .[more than ten] years before they got married. How would you married ladies like to have a husband who lets a real young lady chase him for so long? - if you can depend on an eye witness account?

[husbandoftheyear]

Hope they are not advocates of the new Adventist divorce guide:-

Using my imagination

1. Go on national tv and claim to be working on marriage problems
2. Leave spouse
3a. Expand lust rule to spiritual adultery (whatever that is)
3b. Divorce spouse
4. Gag spouse
5. Whilst gag is in effect defame character of former spouse on tv and to whoever will listen
6. Find younger spouse
7. Marry younger spouse
8. Defame confidents of former spouse
9. Attempt to get point 3 on the next General conference session of 2010 (who knows other 'suffering' colleagues in the church may benefit from this new rule)
10. Attend weddings for former collegues who also experienced point 3

Well, you're close Denny. Put #6 before 3b and you've got it right!

(Find next spouse BEFORE divorcing the other...)

[sister]

...and the alleged incident has been posted like it was recent, it was not. It was approx 15 years ago

Bystander: even Danny Shelton, whose behavior is akin to a hick, red-necked, Southern con artist who steals the nickles and dimes from old ladies on fixed incomes, while using God as his frontman; even he should not be ignorant enough to write the above. Or on second thought, perhaps he did make this very mistake?

First you call the incident alleged, then you say it was written in a way to suggest it was a recent event. After that you state that the incident took place approximately fifteen years ago. By your testimony you have supported the fact that the incident is in fact true and occurred approximately fifteen years ago. You were definitely the last person I expected to verify my statement, although I am sure that was not your intention...

Is the great "anointed one" here among us?

Sister

[Fran]

Bystander: even Danny Shelton, whose behavior is akin to a hick, red-necked, Southern con artist who steals the nickles and dimes from old ladies on fixed incomes, while using God as his frontman; even he should not be ignorant enough to write the above. Or on second thought, perhaps he did make this very mistake?

First you call the incident alleged, then you say it was written in a way to suggest it was a recent event. After that you state that the incident took place approximately fifteen years ago. By your testimony you have supported the fact that the incident is in fact true and occurred approximately fifteen years ago. You were definitely the last person I expected to verify my statement, although I am sure that was not your intention...

Is the great "anointed one" here among us?

Sister

I was going to post about this too!. To me this verifies that the financial problems were bad even 15 years ago! I believe the financial problems began from the very beginning!

Yes, I believe the self made "annointed one" has spoken. Give him enough rope and he will hang himself!

Hey, Bystander. let's talk about finances and LINDA SHELTON. You have shown us these are your favorite subjects.

[Rosyroi]

Hope they are not advocates of the new Adventist divorce guide:-

Using my imagination

1. Go on national tv and claim to be working on marriage problems
2. Leave spouse
3a. Expand lust rule to spiritual adultery (whatever that is)
3b. Divorce spouse
4. Gag spouse
5. Whilst gag is in effect defame character of former spouse on tv and to whoever will listen
6. Find younger spouse
7. Marry younger spouse
8. Defame confidents of former spouse
9. Attempt to get point 3 on the next General conference session of 2010 (who knows other 'suffering' colleagues in the church may benefit from this new rule)
10. Attend weddings for former collegues who also experienced point 3

[sonshineonme]

I really find it interesting that someone that professes to be a Christian would read this and respond in this manner. I find myself, as others have asking you why individuals on one side of this drama deserves understanding and forgiveness, but the lady doesn't. I think the "good book" tells us not be a respecter of persons, but when has that Bible truth ever been practiced in this church-Adventist Church.

Once again, I need to qualify my impression-I care nothing about 3ABN, can count the number of times I have watch its programming on one hand. The Shelton and other players in this fiasco mean nothing to me, but if half of what has been posted on this board is true, there are serious issues around 3ABN and the powers that be.

Lets dispel this fallacy for those who want to keep the status quo so that dying sinners can receive salvation-through 3ABN. The gospel was spread before 3ABN and will continue to be spread with or without it. We limit God, he doesn't need us.

Not just any "christian" , but one that professes to be one and "share" the gospel to the whole world...what could be a worse witness (eyewitness) then this, not only for christiandom, but 7th Day Adventists, as this is NOT what WE are about. This is the devil's work, no doubt about that. What a shame.

[Bystander]

Is the great "anointed one" here among us?

Sister

No, guess not it's just me bystander. As you stated, I said the "alleged" incident meaning that I was told that some years back a cousin that had been fired tried to make a story where the was none on some horses that were purchased approx 15 years. So yes there was some horses purchased and a cousin telling tales, that was the incident I was referring to.

Oh and sister, Yes please please write chapter 2 of naive. You know what they say, Laughter is the Best Medicine." Since it's all made up anyway why don't you switch it this time where Dan is the one with the single tear while Linda is in the private jet, on her way to a big shopping trip, and getting a pedicure along the way.

This post has been edited by Bystander: Jan 30 2007, 12:46 AM

[erik]

No, guess not it's just me bystander. As you stated, I said the "alleged" incident meaning that I was told that some years back a cousin that had been fired tried to make a story where the was none on some horses that were purchased approx 15 years. So yes there was some horses purchased and a cousin telling tales, that was the incident I was referring to.

Oh and sister, Yes please please write chapter 2 of naive. You know what they say, Laughter is the Best Medicine." Since it's all made up anyway why don't you switch it this time where Dan is the one with the single tear while Linda is in the private jet, on her way to a big shopping trip, and getting a pedicure along the way.

Bystander,

Why is danny unwilling do what linda side during the ASI said they want a full and open laying out of the evidence of her affair, i say they asked for that to happen so why not do it. you really have nothing to lose, and it will prove she is a lair right?

just a thought.

erik w

[Fran]

No, guess not it's just me bystander. As you stated, I said the "alleged" incident meaning that I was told that some years back a cousin that had been fired tried to make a story where the was none on some horses that were purchased approx 15 years. So yes there was some horses purchased and a cousin telling tales, that was the incident I was referring to.

Oh and sister, Yes please please write chapter 2 of naive. You know what they say, Laughter is the Best Medicine." Since it's all made up anyway why don't you switch it this time where Dan is the one with the single tear while Linda is in the private jet, on her way to a big shopping trip, and getting a pedicure along the way.

You just can't help it, can you? Gotta' trash Linda at every opportunity. Does Danny ever cry so anyone could write about it? I am of the impression Danny only causes tears. You also delight in hurting people. There is a time to laugh and a time to refrain from laughing. I believe you are not educated enough to know when you laugh and when you don't.

As I see it, If the story line ever says that Danny cried because his wife went shopping in the jet, I would laugh too. Danny probably had to get her out of the house to entertain his other interests.

Now, don't get me wrong, I am sure Danny can cry real crocodile tears if it suits his purpose. In fact he may have to cry real Tammy Fay Bakker tears to get more money from those dumb donors soon.

Come on Bystander, lets talk finances and trust funds. Why won't you come out and play?

[Fran]

No, guess not it's just me bystander. As you stated, I said the "alleged" incident meaning that I was told that some years back a cousin that had been fired tried to make a story where the was none on some horses that were purchased approx 15 years. So yes there was some horses purchased and a cousin telling tales, that was the incident I was referring to.

Oh and sister, Yes please please write chapter 2 of naive. You know what they say, Laughter is the Best Medicine." Since it's all made up anyway why don't you switch it this time where Dan is the one with the single tear while Linda is in the private jet, on her way to a big shopping trip, and getting a pedicure along the way.

Yes, there were horses! All right! Now we are really getting somewhere. Why would Danny's cousin, S. S, tell lies about Danny? Now here is a man that understand the principal of truth. Didn't Danny fire him because this cousin said Danny need to get help to stop lying? Didn't this make Danny mad enough to fire him? Just curious.

Then again, you will probably say he had an ax to grind. Why do all of 3ABN's past employees have an ax to grind with Danny? You know, maybe we could understand 1 or 2, but everyone having an ax to grind speaks volumns about Danny. Especially when everyone is grinding the same ax!

Time is getting short. Have you read the Save 3ABN website lately? What do you make of those stories? Sure looks bad for Danny and Tommy. Danny better call Mr. Moneyman again. This will probably cost Mr Moneyman more than he is willing to pay.

It won't be near $250K this time. The victims just keep piling up.

[Johann]

No, guess not it's just me bystander. ´´- - -way.

How come you seem to use the same computer as Mr. Danny Shelton?

[Fran]

How come you seem to use the same computer as Mr. Danny Shelton?

You are pretty sharp Johann! I figured that out too! Now, all we have to do is go and document all those lies and all that bait!

[Aletheia]

Bystander,

Why is danny unwilling do what linda side during the ASI said they want a full and open laying out of the evidence of her affair, i say they asked for that to happen so why not do it. you really have nothing to lose, and it will prove she is a lair right?

just a thought.

erik w

Umm... Eric, that IS what Danny and 3ABN agreed to do Did you read the ASI letter? The findings and conclusions with the reasons and evidence to support it were to be made public after ASI had heard both sides along with their witnesses and any evidence, Danny and 3ABN agreed to those terms.

Linda did not.

Linda said NOTHING, and her representatives wouldn't agree they wanted the whole process made public (unbiblical) and wanted every other thing under the sun, which ASI had no jurisdiction over, to be brought into it, so ASI had to withdraw.

As if they couldn't resolve the divorce issue, and then take care of the rest of their concerns after that????