Danny Shelton/3abn Seeks Protective Order, ... Again Options

[Eduard]

Oz,

Get your facts straight, the issue was with me referring to "Mr. Pickle" as "Robert". He came here and took umbrage at being called by his given name and started to demand that he be called "Bob" and went on about how he goes by "Bob" . . . when in fact he signed everything in the current case as "Robert" until he started to represent himself pro se . . . soon after his whining here when he began to represent himself he started to sign all his pro se documentation as "Bob" . . . there was never an issue in regards to referring to him as "Mr. Pickle" . . . which I will continue to refer to him as since I was threatened with expulsion if I continued to refer to him as "Robert".

- FHB

fallible,

Why are you so MEAN and UGLY to the people around you?

Eduard

[Eduard]

There is an exception to the rule of using "an" before words that start with vowels only. I.e. "an herb".

jakann,

Right. Words beginning with vowels and semiconsonants take "an," while words beginnning with consonants take "a" as indefinite article.

Eduard

[Eduard]

I take issue with you and others who refer to anyone who supports Danny and 3abn as his "cohorts." Or referring to Danny and his cohorts. Do you honestly think that Danny with his responsibilities at 3abn, almost single handedly building a house and trying to keep on top of his heart problems is reading bsda and organizing people to post in his behalf? If you believe that I've got some ocean front property in Arizona.....I guess we should assume then, that you and others on the "other side" are strictly Linda's "cohorts" and are being paid to post for her. Another ridiculous allegation from your side. I for one have never been told by Danny or anyone else at 3abn to post here, much less, what to say. I believe the same is true for FHB and others here that defend 3abn.

Di, let me include you in this also rather than make another post directly to you. With all your let's be christian to each other you have been guilty time and again of making the same kind of claims as made by ozzie here. I am here of my own accord, my own free will and I post either my opinion or what I know to be fact. I am not told by anyone to do this so please stop with the accusations. You are wrong.

appletree,

You are DSs accomplice because you support and defend him in the wrongs he has been doing for too long.

Eduard

[Johann]

appletree,

You are DSs accomplice because you support and defend him in the wrongs he has been doing for too long.

Eduard

Wonder what it means that the apple does not fall far from the tree?

[runner4him]

FHB,

According to your comments then both law firms and 3 of the lawyers in MN and Massachusetts have to withdraw from representing 3abn and DS since they are all named together in the recent lawsuit that G.Joy filed. From what you are saying that looks like a big problem for 3abn and DS. Anyone out there have an opinion?

Calvin,

It is my understanding that they are both representing themselves pro se. Mr. Pickle had been represented by Laird Heal until Gailon Joy filed his bankruptcy case. At that point, Attorney Heal, by becoming Mr. Joy's counsel created a form of conflict of interest. Attorney Heal had to decide which of the two cases he would be involved in since there was procedural overlap. He chose Mr. Joy which meant he had to drop Mr. Pickle. Mr. Pickle then decided to represent himself pro se.

Now I am sure Mr. Pickle will spin that differently . . . but according to legal counsel there was no way that Attorney Heal could continue to represent Mr. Pickle and Mr. Joy at the same time in the two different cases, it would raise ethical questions.

- FHB

[Pickle]

I do agree with Calvin about the legal counsel. Counsel would be helpful even it it were pro bono legal counsel that could help you with your back-and-forth communication. The different ones -- here and there -- seem to be using your own correspondence to them in an effort to "sink" you. Cases are often lost on technicality.

Actually, before that I used their correspondence in my motion to compel, and before that Gailon used their correspondence in his adversarial proceedings.

[Pickle]

Do you seriously believe you can win this case? How can you reasonably expect to defend yourself? Mercy man! I mean you guys when out of your way to go after 3abn with the save3abn website. Didn't you think they would probably come after you?

I don't think Danny has much to be concerned about. You guys are sinking fast from where I see it. Flying blind by the seat of your pants with no counsel, up against a well financed plaintiff with an army of attorneys, partner in bankruptcy and the website down. Does not look very promising.

Maybe you can look at what I wrote in opposition to their motion for a protective order and tell me how I did.

[princessdi]

So let me get this skrate...Danny just allows you, somebody he doesn't know drom a can of paint let alone talk to(as you claim), to come here and discuss his buisness without saying a word? Nobody from 3ABN knows you are here.....nobody has told any onf the information you have posted here, no matter how intimate about the Shelton's marriage? Surely, the man who is smart enough to co found and co lead 3ABN to the success that it has had, is not going to let somebody he doesn't know just go and tell his buisness on the world wide web. Do you really want us to think that Danny is that stupid? Now that is one thing I do not believe about Danny. I can really understand him really not having time to post here, but have to know that we know better that Danny does not read BSDA. He started reading it before you. Posted here before you. He is still here, looking and reading.

I take issue with you and others who refer to anyone who supports Danny and 3abn as his "cohorts." Or referring to Danny and his cohorts. Do you honestly think that Danny with his responsibilities at 3abn, almost single handedly building a house and trying to keep on top of his heart problems is reading bsda and organizing people to post in his behalf? If you believe that I've got some ocean front property in Arizona.....I guess we should assume then, that you and others on the "other side" are strictly Linda's "cohorts" and are being paid to post for her. Another ridiculous allegation from your side. I for one have never been told by Danny or anyone else at 3abn to post here, much less, what to say. I believe the same is true for FHB and others here that defend 3abn.

Di, let me include you in this also rather than make another post directly to you. With all your let's be christian to each other you have been guilty time and again of making the same kind of claims as made by ozzie here. I am here of my own accord, my own free will and I post either my opinion or what I know to be fact. I am not told by anyone to do this so please stop with the accusations. You are wrong.

[Pickle]

Oz,

Get your facts straight, the issue was with me referring to "Mr. Pickle" as "Robert". He came here and took umbrage at being called by his given name and started to demand that he be called "Bob" and went on about how he goes by "Bob" . . . when in fact he signed everything in the current case as "Robert" until he started to represent himself pro se . . . soon after his whining here when he began to represent himself he started to sign all his pro se documentation as "Bob" . . . there was never an issue in regards to referring to him as "Mr. Pickle" . . . which I will continue to refer to him as since I was threatened with expulsion if I continued to refer to him as "Robert".

- FHB

FHB,

Why did 3ABN and Danny decide in that lawsuit to call me Robert?

No one told me that I could sign my name "Bob" if the lawsuit said "Robert."

You can call me Bob. It's just fine with me. And until you say I can do otherwise, I'll call you by your username or its intials.

[jakann]

jakann,

Right. Words beginning with vowels and semiconsonants take "an," while words beginnning with consonants take "a" as indefinite article.

Eduard

And even regular consonants can have "an" in front of them if they are in an acronym.
I copied this from somewhere: "Having said all this, I think that most people get the indefinite article right nearly all the time because they do it by ear, the right way. But there are some interesting tricky points worth mentioning. One has to do with acronyms, whose article depends on whether the letters are spoken as a groups (a true acronym) or pronounced individually. For example, if we refer to a discussion group within NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), we can write "a NOAA group" (making a word out of NOAA) or "an N-O-A-A group," depending on whether we say NOAA or N-O-A-A. If we want to eliminate the second indefinite article before a pair of words (as in "a dog and cat"), we may do it only if both take the same article. Otherwise, we have to write out the second article (as in "a prize and an honor")."

jakann

[PrincessDrRe]

So let me get this skrate...Danny just allows you, somebody he doesn't know drom a can of paint let alone talk to(as you claim), to come here and discuss his buisness without saying a word? Nobody from 3ABN knows you are here.....nobody has told any onf the information you have posted here, no matter how intimate about the Shelton's marriage? Surely, the man who is smart enough to co found and co lead 3ABN to the success that it has had, is not going to let somebody he doesn't know just go and tell his buisness on the world wide web. Do you really want us to think that Danny is that stupid? Now that is one thing I do not believe about Danny. I can really understand him really not having time to post here, but have to know that we know better that Danny does not read BSDA. He started reading it before you. Posted here before you. He is still here, looking and reading.

AND whether you put an "A", "AND", "AN", or "THE" in that (right or wrong) that is truth.

He's here, he reads, he takes notes, and he gets rather angry sometimes. He also has his minions here too....

DICTIONARY.com - definition of "Minion"<<<---Click Here!!!
min·ion (mĭn'yən)
n.

1. An obsequious follower or dependent; a sycophant.
2. A subordinate official, especially a servile one.
3. One who is highly esteemed or favored; a darling.

[Seraphim7]

Can you explain Ian, in view of what you have written here, why you refer to Bob Pickle as 'Mr Pickle'? If my memory serves me correctly, some time back, Bob asked that he be addressed as 'Bob' - not 'Robert' or 'Mr Pickle'!

Seems like once again, there's one rule that applies to Danny and his cohorts and another rule applies to everyone else!

Again, another valid point. Not to mention he is claiming that I have called him something that I have not. I referred to Ian as Ian and mentioned those of the household of CinDonIanAl. His attempt to misrepresent what was stated simply gives us more evidence of the spinning routine they are so popular for.

Those who are double minded and live a double standard can't help but be unstable in all their ways.

[runner4him]

I guess I have to ask FHB again this question. Can you answer me please?

FHB,

According to your comments then both law firms and 3 of the lawyers in MN and Massachusetts have to withdraw from representing 3abn and DS since they are all named together in the recent lawsuit that G.Joy filed. From what you are saying that looks like a big problem for 3abn and DS. Anyone out there have an opinion?

[Eduard]

And even regular consonants can have "an" in front of them if they are in an acronym.
I copied this from somewhere: "Having said all this, I think that most people get the indefinite article right nearly all the time because they do it by ear, the right way. But there are some interesting tricky points worth mentioning. One has to do with acronyms, whose article depends on whether the letters are spoken as a groups (a true acronym) or pronounced individually. For example, if we refer to a discussion group within NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), we can write "a NOAA group" (making a word out of NOAA) or "an N-O-A-A group," depending on whether we say NOAA or N-O-A-A. If we want to eliminate the second indefinite article before a pair of words (as in "a dog and cat"), we may do it only if both take the same article. Otherwise, we have to write out the second article (as in "a prize and an honor")."

jakann

jakann,

Compound subjects are also another matter because they can be considered a single syntactic unit, and can be prefaced with a single article, as in "a dog and cat [bunch]." Only the context can provide adequate clues for the proper usage of the indefinite and definite articles. Some situations are quite complex, as it happens when speech sounds are merged to ease pronunciation. Written and spoken use of the articles can differ quite a lot.

Eduard

[YogusBearus]

jakann,

Compound subjects are also another matter because they can be considered a single syntactic unit, and can be prefaced with a single article, as in "a dog and cat [bunch]." Only the context can provide adequate clues for the proper usage of the indefinite and definite articles. Some situations are quite complex, as it happens when speech sounds are merged to ease pronunciation. Written and spoken use of the articles can differ quite a lot.

Eduard

You guys are making me crazy! Please understand that some of us never made it past dangling participles. If your intent is to inhibit our posting, you are succeeding in a/an most successful way.

-bear