New Letters At Save3abn Options

[PeacefulBe]

Since the Rockeys are in Pennsylvania, right?, they wouldn't be the ones in Kansas.

PB,

Danny and Linda were flying back from seeing the Nazarene counselors on April 15, based on an email from Danny.

Bob,

Thanks for the info. It helps in completing the picture.

WB,

I Googled the Rockeys with the misspelling and found that, even in conference publications, the lack of the "e" is pretty standard. It makes it hard to find their actually info. Sad.

[Rosyroi]

I have been rereading this thread and I noticed some things that I am sure most of you noticed before but was new ideas to me.

Panama Pete posted an item from save3abn, (page number 2 post #25) giving us the two letters from Danny. One dated April 21, 2004 to invite the two men to visit with the board ( there was no reference available in save3abn to where the meeting will be held or when, if it is available please let me know) The on May 27, 4:57pm the two men were NOT welcome to the 3ABN campgrounds, that if they did come they will be escorted off the campmeeting premises.

(during this time Linda's name and face was erased as if she did not exist. New book written by Kay Kusma, Danny offering to buy Linda's half of the house)


http://www.save3abn.com/danny-shelton-meet-the-board-1.htm[/url]

Next Panama Pete posted another item from save3abn (page number 3, post #44) giving us a letter Walt Thompson wrote to Linda, written May4, 2004 FEDEX effective immediately, 30 days leave of absence to be out of Southern Ill during the whole time, non negotiable.

http://www.save3abn.com/danny-shelton-demi...y-ultimatum.htm

Now for the reason for my posting this.
This looks to me as if Danny had several reasons for getting Linda out of town and keeping the Dr and Johann away from campmeeting.
1. Linda would be not around campmeeting to tell her side of the story to the folk who come to campmeeting.
2. Danny has the oportunity to give his heartfelt "come back to me Linda" even though he said go away and stay away.
3. Great opportunity for folk to give give give because Danny is hurting since his wife is NOT by his side.
4. the Dr and Johann would not be at campmeeting to tell Linda's side of the story.
5. Danny might had an idea the Dr and Johann would be there so he could tell his DEVIL story again, another good give give give, poor anointed one.

Just my opinion.
Rosyroi

This post has been edited by Rosyroi: Mar 12 2007, 12:51 PM

[sonshineonme]

Bob,

Thanks for the info. It helps in completing the picture.

WB,

I Googled the Rockeys with the misspelling and found that, even in conference publications, the lack of the "e" is pretty standard. It makes it hard to find their actually info. Sad.

The Rockeys are wonderful people. It's probably pretty good that Linda didn't go there...Danny would have regretted it.

[Pickle]

Hey, looks like the September 8, 2004 email is up at http://www.save3abn.com/danny-shelton-demi...-of-what-04.htm.

Danny/Bystander/WWJD/Lee/FHB, got some questions.

1. What do you personally thing of Danny repeatedly calling Dr. Abrahamsen a chocolate-covered pile of horse dung/manure/____? Do you think he should apologize for that?

2. When was Danny first showing signs of interest in Brandi? He claims that he wasn't interested in anyone else on September 8, 2004. When is the first indication that he had changed his mind on that one?

[Bystander]

But primarily I want to comment here on the sentence and question that I bolded above. The counseling session in Kansas was one in which both Danny and Linda were present.

One also has to wonder what the Rocky's knew before they agreed to "open their home to her". They are, after all, reputable counselors who give seminars in Adventist churches. It would, I would think, be of interest to know exactly what they were told and what plans they had for that 30 day period.

So, I guess all Lindanites will act as if their previous posts that DS and Walt and JL were all lying about LS having any counseling, just...don't exist. If I had the time I would find them all and post them. Now because watchbird says she did and even gives the names of the counselors, lets forget that several of you were wrong in your accusations. Ever think about how many other things you've been wrong about?

[Pickle]

List all the examples you can find of their being wrong. It's fine with me. And post documents to back up what you say.

But do note that an error like what you are alleging, if such an error really was made, does not compare to child molestation or unbiblical divorce or any of the other serious issues that have been raised.

[PeacefulBe]

So, I guess all Lindanites will act as if their previous posts that DS and Walt and JL were all lying about LS having any counseling, just...don't exist. If I had the time I would find them all and post them. Now because watchbird says she did and even gives the names of the counselors, lets forget that several of you were wrong in your accusations. Ever think about how many other things you've been wrong about?

Bystander,

We had that on March 8th. Nobody was saying that LS and DS didn't have counselling out of state.

Here is a link to my post on the matter. It turns out that Aletheia was asking about comments made by PrincessDrRe but the ones I had searched out were for PrincessDi.

http://www.blacksda.com/forums/index.php?s...mp;#entry183892

Read around my post and you will find all of the information.

Of course, you can do your own search if you think you can find example where the "Lndanites" said DS, Walt and JL were lying about counselling.


PB

[watchbird]

So, I guess all Lindanites will act as if their previous posts that DS and Walt and JL were all lying about LS having any counseling, just...don't exist. If I had the time I would find them all and post them. Now because watchbird says she did and even gives the names of the counselors, lets forget that several of you were wrong in your accusations. Ever think about how many other things you've been wrong about?

List all the examples you can find of their being wrong. It's fine with me. And post documents to back up what you say.

But do note that an error like what you are alleging, if such an error really was made, does not compare to child molestation or unbiblical divorce or any of the other serious issues that have been raised.

Thanks, Bob, but Bystander didn't hit where I was standing.... just another evidence of his poor reading/interpretation/application ability. There is a vast difference in speaking of Linda not having counseling in the true meaning of the word, and saying that she and Danny traveled to speak with a pair of counselors.... ones to whom Danny gave a large donation for their ministry.... ones that held to the concepts of the dominant husband/submissive in all things wife which holds even when a wife is abused.... and true counseling. But that difference would be lost on such a person as Bystander and the other Dannyclones who are posting here.

As for his saying that I gave the names of the counselors.... that merely demonstrates his inability to read... or his ability to read errantly.... since the only names I mentioned were those of Ron and Nancy Rockey.... and these were the ones who were assigned to Linda .... or that Linda was assigned to for 30 days.... but to whom she never went.

As for being occasionally wrong.... I am not infallible, and I have occasionally made a mistake in something I have posted. When that has been pointed out to me, I did not try to cover it up, but I researched the supposed error, and in cases where I discovered something I had written needed changing I acknowledged it and revised it.

And as for his continued attacks on you.... don't let his continual harassement wear you down.... those of us who know you are not fazed by it..... and those newbies who don't know you or the harassing group, very quickly figure out who stands for right and truth.

Carry on....................... we are with you.

[Pickle]

Looks like what's new today at http://www.Save3ABN.com/ is correspondence in which Danny admits that as of July 17, 2004, he had no proof that Linda had given him biblical grounds for divorce.

Also new is an email exchange between Danny and Linda, in which Linda says that Danny never admits to making a mistake, and he then proceeds to prove her right. It's another one of his "pile of" emails.

[from-the-pew]

Looks like what's new today at http://www.Save3ABN.com/ is correspondence in which Danny admits that as of July 17, 2004, he had no proof that Linda had given him biblical grounds for divorce.

Also new is an email exchange between Danny and Linda, in which Linda says that Danny never admits to making a mistake, and he then proceeds to prove her right. It's another one of his "pile of" emails.

I have yet to see a challenge regarding the validity of the email exchanges. Are we to assume that "both sides" accept the emails themselves as legitimate?

A person would have hoped that after so many years as a leader of a ministry, one would have outgrown repetitive references to excrement.....

[Skyhook]

I have yet to see a challenge regarding the validity of the email exchanges. Are we to assume that "both sides" accept the emails themselves as legitimate?

A person would have hoped that after so many years as a leader of a ministry, one would have outgrown repetitive references to excrement.....

It has been said that obsessive perfectionists tend to be constipated types who don't want to get rid of it, whereas sociopathic presonality types like to throw it at other people.

This post has been edited by Skyhook: Mar 14 2007, 12:24 PM

[Noahswife]

It has been said that obsessive perfectionists tend to be constipated types who don't want to get rid of it, whereas sociopathic presonality types like to throw it at other people.

And Skyhook, I am wondering if you might know what is said about someone that seems to be fixated on it?



nw
C"i"

[PeacefulBe]

Looks like what's new today at http://www.Save3ABN.com/ is correspondence in which Danny admits that as of July 17, 2004, he had no proof that Linda had given him biblical grounds for divorce.

Also new is an email exchange between Danny and Linda, in which Linda says that Danny never admits to making a mistake, and he then proceeds to prove her right. It's another one of his "pile of" emails.

I just read through all of the new emails posted over on save3abn.com. Reading those emails from Linda has made me more to believe her "side" of the story. Reading Danny's responses compells me even further to believe her "side" of the story. As more and more documentation is placed on that site, I may just actually become what I have been accused of: being a Lindanite. We shall see.

Of course, if those called "Dannyscribes" would show documentation that proves Danny's claims, I would certainly factor it in as I come to my conclusions on things.

Lee, what do you think?

PB

[caribbean sda]

Reading Danny's responses compells me even further to believe her "side" of the story. As more and more documentation is placed on that site, I may just actually become what I have been accused of: being a Lindanite. We shall see.

Of course, if those called "Dannyscribes" would show documentation that proves Danny's claims, I would certainly factor it in as I come to my conclusions on things.

Lee, what do you think?

PB

The emails allegedly written by Danny Shelton have me wondering if his half of the 10 Commandments book was ghost written. I would be ashamed to have such correspondence attributed to me floating around in cyberspace...

[Aletheia]

I just read through all of the new emails posted over on save3abn.com. Reading those emails from Linda has made me more to believe her "side" of the story. Reading Danny's responses compells me even further to believe her "side" of the story. As more and more documentation is placed on that site, I may just actually become what I have been accused of: being a Lindanite. We shall see.

Of course, if those called "Dannyscribes" would show documentation that proves Danny's claims, I would certainly factor it in as I come to my conclusions on things.

Lee, what do you think?

PB

Well nice job, PB, that's exactly what they intend. You are only reading what they reveal, to give the slant they are presenting. Do you think they are into presenting Danny fairly? Or did you think they weren't representing Linda?

Look at the letters impartially and take note of how much has been edited out.

Then ask yourself, if they are so into making all known, why are they doing that?

What did Linda say that Danny was replying to? What did Danny say that they don't want you to know?

Or you can just stick to your opinions and keep confirming them. And never consider who's really been trashing who, and who they got those letters from.

Your choice.

This post has been edited by Aletheia: Mar 14 2007, 02:03 PM