Letter From Mike Bisson Options

[Bystander]

I also want to know, what is your point?

You are not talking about a house which will be built , you are talking about a house built when???

What is the deal with Governor being concerned in 2005, how does that realate to this discussion?

And what evidence backs up johanns claims???

The point has been made that the owners disagree with what he says...

Can you prove different? If not, again, what is your point?

Aletheia, I think that Laurence, Like observer likes everyone to know that he is familiar with certain laws and codes and obviously has time to look up the answers that he wants to give. Trouble is, usually what he brings up is just useless information that has nothing to do with the actual point of the post.

[Rosyroi]

His fruits or the lack thereof speak volumes. It is interesting to note that when the word went out about Linda and the Dr. A, I felt sorry for Danny. Danny was pleading on the 3ABN for Linda to turn around. Many of us were heartbroken. My spouse and I asked why was she traveling to Norway and spending so much time with this doctor. We heard about the specialty in treatment and began to ask "Why wasn't Danny also involved in the treatment process with Nathan?" Nathan had lived in his house for many years. I presented a generic scenario to several psychologists colleagues and all agreed that the stepfather should have been involved in Nathan treatment recovery. The unanimous conclusion (without having diagnosed and treated Nathan) was that Nathan and Danny did not have a positive relationship. In addition, the fact that the mother and the stepfather were still married and Nathan was going through treatment. This would have been an opportune time for the stepfather to reach out to Nathan and show his love and concern for him, thus taking on a more humane and paternal role.

Let's get real. Danny was tired of Linda and wanted a divorce. He got a quick divorce. This has trouble quite a few people in my area. These people were staunch 3ABN supporters and contributors. It is interesting to sit and listen to them. Not all of these people were fans of Linda, however, they did not like and still don't approve of how Danny got rid of her. The problem was not only the divorce, but the rapidity of such an act and his remarriage. Some believe that if Linda and the doctor were so involved as claimed by Danny, then she would have been the first to get married. However, this is not the case.

Bystander, you sound as though you are a confidant of Danny. There are many people who are troubled by his divorce from Linda, remarriage to Brandy, and the trashing of Linda on 3ABN. Not all of these people are Adventists. Please suggest to him to return to his mission, keep his mouth shut (including his staff) about Linda and others (even through inuendos), and get on with the work that he says that the Lord called him to do. The very people who he is trying to reach are noticing that something is wrong. The very people who he is trying to reach are turned off by it. Danny should cease and decist with his continued rhetoric and get on with the mission of 3ABN! He is hurting himself.

There are people in my neighborhood LOVE 3ABN but are saying they are upset and don't like what Danny spews on world wide television.
Others are saying they quit watching 3ABN because they don't like what Danny says.
I also wish Danny would get back to the mission of 3ABN.

[Rosyroi]

Thank you for clarifying.

I was watching that one also.

[Fran]

Oh, I see so the fact that she was on the phone when he beckoned at all was "too much". Well, he wasn't beckoning too much, cuz according to him she had plenty of time to chat on the phone, etc. Poor thing! BTW, where is Brandi?

Fran: Very GOOD point! I think we need to check HIS phone records and see who was calling him and who he was calling!

I am sure you also realize that there are those who have been "promoted" to such positions for their backbone, and even moreso those who have been chosen for promotion for the lack thereof................

Well these people that continue to stay are in the process of loosing their credibility and their position.

Think about this:

What did Linda vote when Danny was no longer allowed to be a 3ABN employee years ago?

Did she go against Danny's wishes?

Did he just let that pass?

Or did he decide way back then that it would never happen again?

Then BOOM, fast forward to 2003! Linda was on the board at the time. The letter came; what was Linda's reaction?

Did she ever voice her opinion that Melody should not be allowed to sing on 3ABN?

Was this when Danny privately went to others to pray for him because he needed Linda off the board?

Was this actually the preperation of the foundation of doubt to get rid of Linda as far back as then?

What if Danny could no longer allow Linda to go against him where his family was involved?

He felt he not only needed her out of 3ABN, but out of his life too?

The Dr was a total unexpected rabbit caught in Danny's trap. Yep, just in time to fill that need to get rid of Linda.

Could this be true? Is it possible this could have happened.

Now I must sign off, stating the above is only my opinion. The above statements are mine and mine alone. This is my Q-CY/MA-L. Thank you.

[Fran]

I also want to know, what is your point?

You are not talking about a house which will be built , you are talking about a house built when???

What is the deal with the Governor being concerned in 2005, how does that relate to this discussion, of the Troy's house and johann's claims it was built in pygmy proportions, and D.S.wasn't honest enough to keep his agreement?

What agreement Laurence?

And what evidence backs up johanns claims??? DO YOU PERSONALLY KNOW, or have some kind of verification aside from Johann?

The point has been made that the owners disagree with what Johann says...

Can YOU prove different? If not, again, what is YOUR point?

Your anger showeth much!

[princessdi]

Now, Fran, that is not such a far fetched Idea. I once had a very good customer. She was married to a man quite a bit older and that married her from an extremely sheltered home environment, right out of high school(this being her first and only relatinship. Apparently as the years passed, he began "seeing" someone else, but was at a loss as to "exit" his marriage, by now they had three boys. Well, feeling the lack of attention and alienation, the young woman turned to a friend, who ws "there' at that point to talk, listen, etc. Now this young lady was very young, and made the mistake of having her friend call her house. Man that husband took that and ran with it. He had to police come when he ws gettign his things out of the house, because he said that she abused him(the woman was tall, but not big as a minute, In fact my Father over heard her telling me that and said later to me that the man should be ahsamed to tell anybody that woman beat him) and eventually also said she abused the boys. He said ALL kinds of things, made her life a living hell........she was completely clueless until one day she spanked one of her boys and he got mad and told her they were getting a new "mommy' who was nice and didnt' spank them...this was only about a month after he had left. This man called child protectove services I can't tell you how many times. It soon became apparent to them that "he" was crazy and they gave her custody of the boys. So the good Dr. appearance at the right time, is not such a stretch...it's been done....ain't nothin' new under the sun! LOL!!

***I would also like to clarify that the above story is true, but the premise as it pertains to the Shelton case is purely from the Book of Princess***

The Dr was a total unexpected rabbit caught in Danny's trap. Yep, just in time to fill that need to get rid of Linda.


Now I must sign off, stating the above is only my opinion. The above statements are mine and mine alone. This is my Q-CY/MA-L. Thank you.[/b]

[Fran]

Aletheia, I think that Laurence, Like observer likes everyone to know that he is familiar with certain laws and codes and obviously has time to look up the answers that he wants to give. Trouble is, usually what he brings up is just useless information that has nothing to do with the actual point of the post.

Give Observer and LaurenceD a break OK?

Observer does his best. Most of the time he is right on the mark. What can you expect from someone who is always sitting on the politically correct side of the fence at any given moment. It has been difficult now that he has decided to take a stand. It is hard to get off those spiked fences you know!

He can't be all that bad; he reads Voltaire, who by the way was a brilliant man! He caused people not to just take things as stated to them, but to check it out first. That is why we are here right? To check things out?

Another reason I respect him is because he has helped Linda when Danny fired AND divorced her in one BIG breath!

Now I must close out by saying that the above is my opinion and only my opinion. This is my Q-CY/M-A/P-L Statement. (Quick, Cover Your/My A--/Posterior Legally.)

By the way, I still have questions; are you ready?

[LaurenceD]

I also want to know, what is your point?
You are not talking about a house which will be built , you are talking about a house built when???
What is the deal with the Governor being concerned in 2005, how does that relate to this discussion, of the Troy's house and johann's claims it was built in pygmy proportions, and D.S.wasn't honest enough to keep his agreement?
What agreement Laurence?
And what evidence backs up johanns claims??? DO YOU PERSONALLY KNOW, or have some kind of verification aside from Johann?
The point has been made that the owners disagree with what Johann says...
Can YOU prove different? If not, again, what is YOUR point?

Just observing this series of incoherent questions above, the answers would not likely mean much to you.

]Aletheia, I think that Laurence, Like observer likes everyone to know that he is familiar with certain laws and codes and obviously has time to look up the answers that he wants to give. Trouble is, usually what he brings up is just useless information that has nothing to do with the actual point of the post.

That's probably the best way for you to look at it.

[Seraphim7]

[Lee]

Give Observer and LaurenceD a break OK?

Observer does his best. Most of the time he is right on the mark. What can you expect from someone who is always sitting on the politically correct side of the fence at any given moment. It has been difficult now that he has decided to take a stand. It is hard to get off those spiked fences you know!

He can't be all that bad; he reads Voltaire, who by the way was a brilliant man! He caused people not to just take things as stated to them, but to check it out first. That is why we are here right? To check things out?

Another reason I respect him is because he has helped Linda when Danny fired AND divorced her in one BIG breath!

Now I must close out by saying that the above is my opinion and only my opinion. This is my Q-CY/M-A/P-L Statement. (Quick, Cover Your/My A--/Posterior Legally.)

By the way, I still have questions; are you ready?

Voltaire brilliant? I don't think so Fran.

Here is what God said about Voltaire through the pen of Ellen G. White:

"When Voltaire was five years old, he committed to memory an infidel poem, and the pernicious influence was never effaced from his mind. He became one of Satan's most successful agents to lead men away from God. Thousands will rise up in the judgment and charge the ruin of their souls upon the infidel Voltaire." Child Guidance, p. 196.

You can also read Great Controversy, p. 281 and 288 if you want more information. There you can read where she said Voltaire spread his poison of infidelity everywhere.

Brilliant? Absolutely not in the eyes of God. He will answer for the loss of souls someday because of his spreading of lies, THOUSANDS (plural) of souls will be lost because of him. I wouldn't read this mans writings for anything. I'd stay far away from them.

[lurker]

QUOTE(princessdi @ Mar 6 2007, 01:04 PM)
BTW, where is Brandi?


It would seem that the problem the old wife tried to help her son solve, the new wife may have with her brother's problems.

[Bystander]

QUOTE(princessdi @ Mar 6 2007, 01:04 PM)
BTW, where is Brandi?
It would seem that the problem the old wife tried to help her son solve, the new wife may have with her brother's problems.

Now what are you trying to insinuate and spread. Is there no end? In fact, Calvin can correct me if I am wrong, but I thought Brandi was off limits. She hasn't done anything to anybody and should not even be brought up here.
Calvin is that right or wrong?

[Bystander]

Voltaire brilliant? I don't think so Fran.

Here is what God said about Voltaire through the pen of Ellen G. White:

"When Voltaire was five years old, he committed to memory an infidel poem, and the pernicious influence was never effaced from his mind. He became one of Satan's most successful agents to lead men away from God. Thousands will rise up in the judgment and charge the ruin of their souls upon the infidel Voltaire." Child Guidance, p. 196.

You can also read Great Controversy, p. 281 and 288 if you want more information. There you can read where she said Voltaire spread his poison of infidelity everywhere.

Brilliant? Absolutely not in the eyes of God. He will answer for the loss of souls someday because of his spreading of lies, THOUSANDS (plural) of souls will be lost because of him. I wouldn't read this mans writings for anything. I'd stay far away from them.

Wow, this sheds some light on a subject that keeps being mentioned here. EGW couldn't be any plainer on the subject. That helps me understand the "personalities" of those that are a big fan of Voltaire.

[princessdi]

I am not insinuating anything. I just asked where she was. To my knowledge she has not been on the show, or very visible lately. That is all I meant. Now, from your response one would thing something was wrong. I don't think we can get around Brandi being brought up either. Now what is off limits is anything pertaining to her life before marrying Danny. However, she will be mentioned as she inherited this mess through marriage.


@ Bystander trying to tell Calvin on me! Stop!

Now what are you trying to insinuate and spread. Is there no end? In fact, Calvin can correct me if I am wrong, but I thought Brandi was off limits. She hasn't done anything to anybody and should not even be brought up here.
Calvin is that right or wrong?

[lurker]

Now what are you trying to insinuate and spread. Is there no end? In fact, Calvin can correct me if I am wrong, but I thought Brandi was off limits. She hasn't done anything to anybody and should not even be brought up here.
Calvin is that right or wrong?

O.K. Even if we say she is off limits, is her brother? It is a matter of public record in the courts. Does not necessarily reflect badly on her. Just that she may feel that he needs moral support and sympathy.